Its amazingly simple, but image quality is worse than the old time mavicas. So buy it for your kids, and save for something like Casio Exilim or Nikon over 4 MP.

For the past century, Kodak has made great film and bad cameras. Nothing has changed. I bought the 6200 because it was cheap. It produced photos that only a kid could like, and the camera broke after 8 months. Kodak would not honor the repair warranty.

Bought this as a gift for my parents. Was disappointed as soon as I got the camera in my hands.

1) Very 'cheap' feel to it. Lightweight plastic body.

2) Preview screen has very low resolution. I found the LCD screen to be difficult to use because of the low quality

3) FIXED FOCUS. I completely missed that this camera has no optical zoom or auto-focus. Thus, every picture you take with the dig. zoom is bound to be fuzzy.

The only plus I found is very easy-to-use controls.

I bought this camera for my mother. She is a beginner in using digital cameras. This camera was perfect for her. It's easy to use and the picture quality is surprisingly good for 2MP. This was definitely a good buy. It is the best camera at the best price for beginners.

This camera takes images with great color HOWEVER, the images are perhaps the WORST of any 2MP camera. They are grainy, noisy, poorly compressed (large files but poor quality). This camera also uses up 2-AA Batteries within about 35 shots- not good!

Look elsewhere for a camera.

Some months ago i bought a 5mp samsung and decided to buy also a cheaper one as a spair camera that would also fit for an every-day use. I chose the kodak cx6200, and couldn't be happier with my decision.
Despite of not being the best camera around, it delivers everything it promisses to: a great value, a very nice picture quality for a 2mp (has an almost absolute color fidelity to the real photo object), a great build quality and a good batery life. Of course, it has its flaws (e.g. no lens cover and a just reasonable lcd, wich gets very dark at moderate lightning conditions), but the camera's qualities easily overcome all of them. I truly recommend it fot everybody wich is on a budget or trying to keep the "good one" safe from scratches and drops during the daily use.

I have enjoyed using. Instructions are easy to follow and accurate. Product works to my satisfaction.

IMHO, this was a pretty good camera for the time I've had it. The photos came out adequately clear.

The only complaints I have are:

1. it takes a long time between shots, which is really not a huge deal since I didn't miss too too many shots

2. the picture quality becomes really blurry when you zoom in after a certain point (to get a bigger and better quality picture I just crop during editing)

3. the screen goes black in low light where you have to guess and shoot

4. it goes through batteries very quickly

5. moving photos become a blurry mess in night scene mode

6. after a while (about a year), the camera just would not come on at all unless I kept turning it off and on until it finally came on

7. the flash causes the pictures to look grainy in low light

Overall, the camera wasn't terrible and I adjusted to its setbacks (e.g., carrying a lot of batteries, keeping the camera on, turning the flash off, etc.). I managed to get a lot of good shots in spite of.

I had this camera for about two years and my brother lost it on me. It was a really good camera and took me a year to figure out how to use digital zoom (left and right arrows) but anyway i loved this camera. Took outstanding pictures.

Too sensible to rain whater, just used twice and it broken.