compact camera + water proof housing - which one is better
Posted: 25 August 2008 10:12 PM  [Ignore]
Grouper (Zacki)
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  16
Joined  2004-02-05

Hi :

I’m going to buy a set composed of compact camera + WP Housing.
I’ve seen, among many options, the following :

1) Canon A-570 IS + Canon WP-DC 12
2) Nikon Coolpix L18 + Ikelite #6280.19

Besides, there is an option of Ikelite WP housing for the Canon camera #6140.57

Which should be recomended. Besides, the Ikelite WP housings are better than the Canon WP housings, in the case I decide for the A-570 IS ?


Profile
 
 
Posted: 26 August 2008 09:19 AM  [Ignore]  [ # 1]
Avatar
Digideep team
RankRankRankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2453
Joined  2004-08-17
Germany, Berlin

Size-wize the Canon combination is much better.
That is good for traveling.

However the Ikelite + Nikon option is more
robust, if you look at the housing option.

I am afraid the final decision is up to you wink


 Signature 

HIER CLICKEN >> Macht beim großen Weihnachts-Posting-Wettrennen mit!

Help other users and submit a picture taken with your camera! *

Profile
 
 
Posted: 27 August 2008 01:00 PM  [Ignore]  [ # 2]
Grouper (Zacki)
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  16
Joined  2004-02-05

Hi Andi :

Suppose that I decide for the Canon + ikelite housing, this would be the best option ?


Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 August 2008 01:04 AM  [Ignore]  [ # 3]
Avatar
Napoleon Wrasse
RankRankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  102
Joined  2007-05-11
Auckland, New Zealand

There is no single ‘best’ option that will always be best in every circumstance.  It all depends on what you want from your rig, and what you do with it.

I’m not familiar with the Nikon camera you list, but in terms of popularity out in the market place, Canon’s point and shoot cameras seem to be more popular.  Things that might make you choose one camera over another are very variable, as are things that might make you choose one housing over another.

Considerations you might want to take into account include:
- physical size - the ikelite housings are larger than the Canon housings.  If you travel alot, smaller might be better.
- quality - there’s no denying that the Ikelite housings are better built than the Canon housings.  They are more robust, but this comes at a price, in terms of size and cost.  One thing I have noticed is that the controls on the Ikelite housings are also better than those on the Canon housings.  In particular, the shutter release control on Ike housings is usually a lever which gives you better senstivity to find the ‘half press’ to prefocus the camera.
- lens accessories - will you want to add wide angle or close up lens converters (wet lenses)?  If so, you need to look at what is available for each housing.  Many (but not all) Ike housings have a screw thread on the port so attachment of accessory lenses is easy.  Inon and other companies make converters to allow the attachement of accessory lenses to some (but not all) Canon housings.
- strobes - strobes can be added to both Canon and Ike housings, but if you like Ike strobes, it may work out easier to have the Ike housing because the strobe system is designed to work with their housings.  That said, you can get an ikelite tray that pretty much any Canon housing bolts on to, and the strobes attach to the tray instead.
- depth rating.  Ike housings are rated (mostly) to 60m, Canon housings (mostly) to 40m.  If you dive deeper than 40m, then the Canon housing obviously isn’t really a choice for you.
- How does photography fit into your diving - do you dive to take photographs, or do you take photographs as you dive?  If the former, then you will probably care more about the finer details of your gear, and so the Ikelite housing may be more favourable to you.  If the latter, the Canon housing will probably be fine for your needs.

It’s really alot like choosing a car:  you need to identify your needs to determine what will be best for you, and as always, your choice will probably be limited by your budget. 

Its not really valid to just say that one or other combination is the best.  It depends on what you want, and what you want is to be able to take a few pics of your dives to remember them by / share with friends or whatever, then your needs will be fairly generic and either of the two choices you have identified would do the job just fine.  If what you want is more complex than that, then those wants will start to narrow the range of valid choices, although conversely, the more specific you are about what you want, the more you will find that all choices represent some sort of compromise. 

If you want more advice from people here, it would help if you gave details of what you want from your rig, where you plan to dive, what sort of conditions are typical there, what sort of things you want to photograph, etc.  Then people can share their experience of what has worked for them and what has not.  It also helps if you demonstrate that you have done some research of your own, i.e. reading past posts on this board, and others.

Good luck in your search.


 Signature 

Graham
http://www.fishonfilm.co.nz

Profile
 
 
Posted: 28 August 2008 01:05 PM  [Ignore]  [ # 4]
Grouper (Zacki)
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  16
Joined  2004-02-05

Hi Graham :

Your explanation gave light to me. Thanks a lot. It’s pretty complete and very clear.
I’ve read some posts and have talk with some people and every one recommends Canon as the best choice for compact camera. Also sure that Ikelite WP Housings are the best option. The point is that I own an old Nikon film camera that gave me lots of beatiful shots. For me Nikon will always be a great brand.
As you mention, now I dive and take photos to remember and show. Perhaps in the future, who knows. I’m almost new in diving and I’m discovering the beauty of all this, however, all this is also expensive. It’s not possible to speak about return of investment in this type of things, where there is a high quote of pleasure dificult to quantify.


Profile
 
 
Posted: 04 September 2008 07:00 PM  [Ignore]  [ # 5]
Grouper (Zacki)
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  16
Joined  2004-02-05

Well, the first step has been given. I have already bougth the Canon A-570IS. Now I’m serching where to buy the WP Housing.


Profile
 
 
Posted: 22 September 2008 05:02 PM  [Ignore]  [ # 6]
Grouper (Zacki)
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  16
Joined  2004-02-05

Second step given. I’ve bought the Canon WP-DC 12 water proof housing.
I’ve preferred the Canon option instead of the ikelite WPH because the concurrence of several factors.
1) Canon housing is designed directly for the A-570IS camera and by the same people.
2) Canon housing is smaller than the ikelite housing.
3) Canon housing has a flash diffuser and ikelite doesn’t.
4) Ikelite housing covers the camera flash.
5) Canon housing is cheaper than Ikelite housing (USD 147 Canon, USD 300 Ikelite) (Canon List price is USD 240, but I could buy at 147.61 in Amazon)
6) In spite that the Ikelite housing is designed for 60 mts and Canon only for 40 mts deep, I’ve not going to dive beyond 40 mts.


Profile